Türkçe versiyonu için buraya tıklayınız.
XENOPOETICS
We are going through a period in which the habitats of both human and non-human beings are rapidly transforming due to ecological and political reasons. This transformation manifests most clearly in two ways: from a human perspective, through the increase in migration, and from an ecological perspective, through the decline in biodiversity and endemic ecological crises. The transformation of habitats is not limited to mobility, meaning the act of moving from one place to another; it also includes the changes in environmental conditions affecting spatially fixed living and non-living entities within their existing habitats.
Within this transformation, as I transition from a Mediterranean climate to a subtropical one and from one culture to another, two fundamental concepts continuously emerge in my perception: home and foreignness. While exploring the physical and mental, cultural and wild, familiar and unfamiliar dimensions of the concept of home, I began observing the changes in my natural surroundings through underground and aerial roots, rhizomes, branches, symbiotic climbing plants, and mycorrhizal networks.
While contemplating the eco-politics of swamps, I encountered the film adaptation of Delia Owens’ novel Where the Crawdads Sing. I was particularly intrigued by how the protagonist, Kya, exists within the swamp ecosystem, her social exclusion, her deeply intertwined relationship with nature, and the portrayal of the concept of natural law. Inspired by these ideas, and resonating with the ideal of horizontal power dynamics—which seeks to transcend traditional human-non-human boundaries and address inequalities between privileged and marginalized groups—I began creating drawings that explore the poetics of foreignness and the unknown.
This text constructs a narrative through the intersections of home and foreignness, connective networks, posthumanist ethics, film, and drawings.
1. Spatial Transformation, Foreignness, and Entanglement
Miami is a city shaped by constant intersections—between the natural and the artificial, the culture of touristic entertainment and the raw wilderness, the familiar and the foreign. Situated between the Atlantic Ocean to the east and the Everglades’ vast expanse of swamps and wetlands to the west, it exists in a state of fluid transformation, driven by the richness of its subtropical climate and the diverse cultural and biological ecosystems it sustains. It is a place where the intensity of global cultural flows collides with the unique and intricate dynamics of a swamp ecosystem.
Swamps and wetlands often carry negative cultural connotations, yet they house some of the most complex and richly layered ecosystems—more intricate than many other landscapes. Unfortunately, this unique beauty often remains overlooked.
The Everglades, once a vast, nearly flat seabed submerged at the end of the Last Ice Age, is one of the most active regions of modern carbonate deposition, thanks to its limestone foundation. Recognized by UNESCO, this subtropical wetland supports a delicate interplay of coastal and marine ecosystems, hosting an array of biological processes and untamed wildlife. The very structure of this ecosystem is deeply shaped by the geological composition of the region[1].
A major visual influence in the drawings comes from the intricate plant networks of the Everglades. This network forms a self-sustaining system, where underground and aerial roots interweave, feeding and supporting one another. Freshwater plants, swamp trees, the supportive roots of banyan trees, the saltwater-adaptive root systems of mangroves, and bromeliads sustained by aerial roots all reveal a fundamental truth of nature: interdependence. This vast botanical web is not merely an aesthetic inspiration but a vital force that ensures ecological equilibrium through water filtration, carbon storage, erosion control, and habitat formation[2].
The Everglades itself functions as a colossal natural filter, purifying water as it moves southward toward Florida Bay and the Florida Keys. It also replenishes underground aquifers, supplying drinking water to more than eight million people. Historically, this ecosystem stretched from Orlando, flowing through the Kissimmee Chain of Lakes into Lake Okeechobee before draining into Florida Bay—but today, it has been reduced to less than half its original size. Urban development, agricultural expansion, and flood-control canals have disrupted over 70% of its natural water flow, threatening the integrity of the wetlands. Native bird species and other wildlife populations have drastically declined, with some disappearing entirely[3].
Drainage canals and pumping stations have fundamentally altered the Everglades’ natural water cycle, destabilizing its ecosystem. Meanwhile, agriculture, industrial activity, and urban sprawl have wiped out over half of the region, erasing vital habitats and drying up wetlands. The impact is not just human-made—invasive species such as the Burmese python have further disrupted native ecosystems, severely diminishing biodiversity[4].
Beyond habitat destruction, fertilizer runoff from agricultural lands continues to deteriorate water quality[5]. Due to its low elevation, the Everglades is also highly vulnerable to sea-level rise, which exacerbates saltwater intrusion and water contamination. Rising temperatures have begun to disrupt the breeding cycles of key species, particularly alligators and crocodiles. The reduced flow of freshwater and increasing saltwater intrusion are pushing coastal habitats like mangrove forests and seagrass beds to the brink, endangering over 2,000 plant and animal species[6].
Yet, despite these threats, the Everglades is at the center of the largest ecological restoration initiative ever undertaken by the U.S. Congress. The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) seeks to revitalize South Florida’s water resources by increasing both water quantity and quality, restoring water flow to Everglades National Park, and rehabilitating degraded ecosystems. A key goal is also to reclaim freshwater that would otherwise be lost to the ocean, reestablishing disrupted natural cycles[7].
The entanglement of culture and wilderness becomes visible not only in the ways they sustain each other but also in the ways they inflict damage upon one another. In a landscape where this paradox is starkly felt, spatial transformation produces a form of foreignness that extends beyond mere estrangement from nature. This foreignness does not arise solely from displacement or disconnection; it also carries with it the excitement of encountering a new environment.
At the same time, there exists another kind of foreignness, tied not to the unfamiliar but to what has already been known—a dissonance with one’s accustomed culture and natural habitat. This is not simply a biological, physical, or chemical process; rather, it signals a psychological and cultural state of social alienation.
Foreignness, with its inherent uncertainty, has always had the capacity to invoke primal fear, triggering a reflex of avoidance. Yet, the unknown also possesses its own autopoiesis—a self-generating logic imbued with its own unique beauty. Unlike an allopoietic system, which uses raw materials to create something distinct (like a factory transforming inputs into outputs), an autopoietic system is self-producing[8].
In this sense, ecological systems can be understood as autopoietic structures, capable of sustaining themselves over long time scales without external intervention. However, this framework alone is insufficient for understanding the complexities of the world. The Earth is not a closed system; it is open to external cosmic forces, continuously changing, and still full of mysteries we have yet to uncover. To understand it, we must move beyond a closed-system mindset and adopt an approach based on relations and relational dynamics. A sympoietic (co-producing) perspective enables us to view life-sustaining processes not as isolated cycles but as part of an interconnected and continuously evolving network.
As Latour argues, the Earth should not be conceived as a mechanical or cybernetic system, where we can only observe isolated components of a predetermined whole. The failure to integrate the social and the natural into a holistic framework is one of the fundamental conceptual errors of political ecology. This is precisely where the concept of sympoiesis comes into play. Defined by Haraway, sympoiesis means “making together”—but it is not limited to human agency. Rather, all organisms co-create and transform their ecological environments through mutual relationships[9]. As Dempster emphasizes, sympoietic systems are not confined by spatial or temporal boundaries; instead, they function as complex, evolving networks of interdependencies. This perspective compels us to see the Earth not as a static structure but as a process of continuous co-creation.
In the Everglades, I am drawn not only to the entanglement of culture and nature—particularly the fusion of ephemeral entertainment culture with wild ecosystems—but also to the subterranean and aerial networks that link plants and trees within this vast landscape. The transformation of survival into an aesthetic form, where human-technology-nature-animal-plant-fungus-bacteria-virus-organ-vein-branch-root-stone-organic-inorganic-abstract-real all blend into one another, serves as a conceptual foundation of the drawings.
This entanglement brings to mind not only sympoiesis but also the concepts of symbiosis and transcorporeality. Symbiosis refers to a prolonged coexistence between two different species, in which they continuously interact. This relationship can take various forms: mutualism, where both organisms benefit; commensalism, where one benefits without harming the other; or parasitism, where one benefits at the expense of the other[10]. Symbiotic relationships are fundamental interactions that sustain the balance of ecosystems and shape evolutionary processes, ultimately forming the technical foundation of sympoiesis.
Another concept intertwined with posthumanist thought is transcorporeality—the idea that bodily boundaries are permeable and that humans are in a constant material exchange with the world. Emerging at the intersection of new materialism and materialist feminism, this perspective argues that all living beings exist in an embodied entanglement with their environments, continually transforming and being transformed within this dynamic web of relations.
However, transcorporeality is not simply a framework that moves beyond the human; rather, it begins with the human itself as a way to challenge Western human exceptionalism. It rejects the notion that the body can be understood in absolute separation from its surroundings and instead reveals how humans are constantly interrupted and reshaped by material processes. Mapping these transformations across all species and scales is essential to forming the ethical and political foundations of transcorporeality. In direct opposition to the individual subject of Western humanism, this perspective does not conceive of the human as a transcendent, disembodied entity detached from the world. Instead, it recognizes the human as an interwoven being, enmeshed within biological, technological, economic, social, and political systems. While transcorporeality acknowledges human existence within the capitalist system, it resists its fixation on surface-level appealing objects and instead interrogates the material processes that span from production to destruction. It examines how bodies, spaces, and matter are entangled with one another. Rather than promoting a detached observational gaze, transcorporeality calls for an understanding of the world as a material existence in a state of continual becoming[11].
2. Where the Crawdads Sing and Posthumanist Ethics
Adapted in 2022 by director Olivia Newman from Delia Owens’ 2018 novel of the same name, Where the Crawdads Sing follows Kya, a young woman abandoned by her family and excluded by society, who lives in complete harmony with the swamp. The film portrays her process of integrating the survival skills she learns from nature into human culture. While depicting a perspective outside the human-centered system, it questions whether ecological and relational justice is possible.
In the context of posthumanism, what stands out most is the ethical inquiries the film provokes. The narrative revolves around Kya’s deep connection with nature, her exclusion from society, and her eventual entanglement in a murder case. The film’s engagement with natural law has drawn criticism for its divergence from positivist legal values. Natural law theory proposes that human nature and universal moral principles establish objective and immutable laws governing human behavior. According to this perspective, certain legal norms derive their authority not only from human-made regulations but also from universal moral truths and the fundamental conditions of human nature[12]. This theory, while historically influential, remains contested within legal philosophy. The film’s interpretation of natural law through an ecological lens represents a particular reading that departs from traditional natural law theory’s focus on human rationality and moral reasoning.
The intersection of natural law theory with ecological justice in the film raises several critical questions:
- Is justice an exclusively human construct, or can it be reconsidered through a broader ecological lens? Could artistic and cultural agency generate new forms of activism within the framework of ecological justice?
- Does nature establish its own mechanisms of justice, or is justice fundamentally a human concept?
- Can humans reshape their moral frameworks to foster mutual well-being in relationships with non-human entities?
These questions suggest that as the boundaries between humans and nature blur, ethical concepts, too, may become fluid and relational. The film’s treatment of natural law, while departing from traditional interpretations, opens up new possibilities for thinking about justice in an ecological context.
From the perspective of co-production and networked relationships, Kya’s symbiotic bond with nature integrates her into the ecosystem that defines her existence. Her individuality is articulated through her relationality with nature, making her a component of the swamp’s productive processes. Her way of existing through respect for difference reflects the possibility of alternative realities within the framework of sympoiesis.
Similarly, in terms of intercorporeal fluidity, in a world where the boundaries between the human body and nature are continuously shifting, Kya’s experience challenges the stability of human ethics, spirituality, and intellectual capacity, suggesting that these structures are shaped through their entanglement with the material world.
3. Xenopoetics
The Greek word xenos translates to “foreigner, foreignness”, yet it also carries meanings that soften the unease of alienation, such as “guest, refugee, a welcomed visitor, or someone with the right to hospitality[13]“.
Kristen Alvanson first introduced the term xenopoetics in reference to Iranian philosopher Reza Negarestani’s theory-fiction work, Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials. According to Alvanson, xenopoetics is about creating something from materials and is inherently linked to unknowing as a mode of communication: “The unraveling of knowledge and knowability is the foundational condition of xenopoetic creativity.” The rejection of knowability and temporal anomalies serve to displace the human subject from its self-assured creative centrality, encouraging modes of thought that attune to non-human, extra-human, and post-human forces while tracing their entanglements with feminist legacies[14].
A concept that remains relatively unexplored, xenopoetics is a thinking mode dedicated to dismantling inherited identities and affirming existential fluidity. It aligns with postmodern aesthetics, positioning art not as a transcendent entity but as an immanent one. Within the networked structures of aesthetic formations, gaps and voids exist—these ruptures within solidity become the very spaces where art resides[15].
My approach to xenopoetics stems from an interest in uncovering the poetics of the foreign and the unknown, and exploring the forms through which mutual recognition unfolds. From a posthumanist perspective, it is crucial not to overlook the primitive, unknown aspects of humanity and its ethical dimensions in the process of technological integration. The questions that emerge from the deconstruction of the ideal male-human identity, glorified by Western humanism, form the foundation of this concept. Xenopoetics, within the identity and meaning crises of the twenty-first century, offers an alternative approach to questioning and unlearning deeply ingrained misconceptions from the past. In this context, xenopoetics—an approach to creativity that is not centered on the human—opens up space for the productivity of not only human subjects but also non-human entities, machines, and ecosystems.
Throughout the text, elements such as spatial transformation, a film exploring the relationship between humans and wildlife, the entangled aesthetics of the Everglades, and the intersection of drawings provide a framework that supports this approach. This perspective, which invites a rethinking of the boundaries between technology, humanity, and nature, can contribute to generating new meanings in a posthuman world by interweaving ethics, object-oriented thought, identity, and creativity.
Works Cited
[1] UNESCO World Heritage List – Everglades
[http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/76](http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/76)
[2] Florida Seminole Tourism – Ten Plants of the Everglades
[https://floridaseminoletourism.com/ten-plants-of-the-everglades/](https://floridaseminoletourism.com/ten-plants-of-the-everglades/)
[3] Conservancy of Southwest Florida – Everglades Restoration
[https://conservancy.org/everglades-restoration/](https://conservancy.org/everglades-restoration/)
[4] Florida Museum – Everglades Threats
[https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/southflorida/regions/everglades/threats/](https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/southflorida/regions/everglades/threats/)
[5] Everglades Foundation – Everglades Ecology
[https://www.evergladesfoundation.org/everglades-ecology](https://www.evergladesfoundation.org/everglades-ecology)
[6] EPA – Climate Change and the Florida Everglades
[https://www.epa.gov/climateimpacts/climate-change-connections-florida-everglades](https://www.epa.gov/climateimpacts/climate-change-connections-florida-everglades)
[7] Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)
[https://www.evergladesrestoration.gov/comprehensive-everglades-restoration-plan](https://www.evergladesrestoration.gov/comprehensive-everglades-restoration-plan)
[8] Oxford Reference – “Entanglement”
[https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095436328](https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095436328)
[9] Petersmann, Marie-Catherine – “Sympoietic Thinking and Earth System Law”
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100114](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100114)
[10] Martin, Paul A., D. Jayanthi, and Leena Sebastian – “Primary and Secondary Endosymbionts Aphid: Buchnera sps.”
[https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99334-0.00010-4](https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99334-0.00010-4)
[11] Braidotti, Rosi, and Maria Hlavajova, eds. – Posthuman Glossary
[https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/posthuman-glossary-9781350030244/](https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/posthuman-glossary-9781350030244/)
[12] Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Natural Law
[https://iep.utm.edu/natlaw/](https://iep.utm.edu/natlaw/)
[13] Etymology Online – Xeno
[https://www.etymonline.com/word/xeno-](https://www.etymonline.com/word/xeno-)
[14] Hangar.org – Xenopoetics
[https://hangar.org/en/agenda-hangar/holes-into-the-future-xenopoetica-y-pensamiento-mas-alla-de-lo-humano/](https://hangar.org/en/agenda-hangar/holes-into-the-future-xenopoetica-y-pensamiento-mas-alla-de-lo-humano/)
[15] Cabrales, Robert E. – “On the Xenopoetics of Alchemical Theater”
[https://www.academia.edu/38599146/On_the_Xenopoetics_of_Alchemical_Theater_as_an_Affective_Model_for_Ritual_Hyperoccultation](https://www.academia.edu/38599146/On_the_Xenopoetics_of_Alchemical_Theater_as_an_Affective_Model_for_Ritual_Hyperoccultation)
